Package.json unpkg download#

Figma: A large UI kit with over 600 handcrafted Material UI components.Design resourcesĪ set of reusable components for design tools is available, designed to match the React components and to help you craft great products: You should consider pointing to a specific version, such as v5.0.0. This pointer is unstable, it shifts as we release new versions. ⚠️ The UMD links are using the latest tag to point to the latest version of the library.

Package.json unpkg download#

The client has to download the entire library, regardless of which components are actually used,Īffecting performance and bandwidth utilization. ⚠️ Using this approach in production is discouraged though.

one for development: one for production: can follow this CDN example to quickly get started.

Two Universal Module Definition ( UMD) files are provided: Gosh it will be nice when everything uses ES modules and ES imports…Įdit: We’ve updated d3-require to look at the can start using Material UI with minimal Front-end infrastructure, But, it would be nice to avoid loading the package.json in the common case where a module doesn’t have any dependencies. That said, Observable’s require may have to load the package.json anyway to do dependency version resolution, so possibly we don’t need this feature-we could check the package.json for an amd entry before fetching the module from unpkg. I could do the same for an AMD entry, but I’m limited to a single unpkg entry field, which is used for our current minified UMD. We worked around this issue for Node by providing a CommonJS bundle for the main entry ( d3.node.js). The non-core modules depend on core D3 modules, and our require isn’t smart enough to know that the d3 default bundle provides the core modules, so the core modules are loaded multiple times. This may be useful for D3 and require in Observable.Ĭurrently, you can’t use the d3 default bundle along with “non-core” D3 modules that are not included in the default bundle, such as d3-geo-polygon or d3-sankey. Also, the ?module query parameter is already being used for something, so we shouldn't overload it to mean something else here. But authors would always be in control of the value of that query parameter. In other words, we always need to know exactly which query parameters are valid and which ones we don't support, so we can't use ?production and ?development and anything else that someone wants to put in their package.json. Side note about implementation: We need to use the ?bundle query parameter (or something else that we know) so that we don't have a lot of different potential query parameters that could possibly bust the cache. This would allow package authors to potentially move around the location of their bundles inside their package without having to change the URL. Then people could use an alias like /react?bundle=production to load the production UMD build. Taking it one step further, it would be interesting to be able to specify external dependencies which must be included/imported beforehand (which something like dynamic-cdn-webpack-plugin could pickup on and perform that work to ensure everything that is needed is loaded). Something like the above example would be useful to allow the developer to specify which bundle they want. Other bundles don't include the third-party dependencies, requiring the user to import them beforehand (this is done so the third-party dependencies are not duplicated in various bundles. Some of these bundles include third-party dependencies to that including it is all you need.

We generate and output several UMD bundles. I have a similar need for some of the libraries I support.